FACULTY PEER REVIEW
Instructor: Mike Splane
Reviewers: Kent Webb, Wendy Wang, Ashraf Shirani
Class: Bus91L
2007 Comments:
The B91L instructors have
cooperated very well in insuring that their classes are consistent with the
goals of this computer lab. Mike Splane
has been a leader in developing content and has designed a very effective and
extensive web site that all of the instructors use, while allowing for some
individual personalization of the instructors material as well.
Mr. Splane has developed a
workbook for his lab that fits the teaching goals of giving the students
practical training in Microsoft Word, Excel, and PowerPoint. In addition, a very detailed web page used to
support the class provides the students with a great deal of information
without the high costs found in some of the other lab classes in the
department. This is a very significant
contribution to teaching of the students and I applaud Mr. Splane for his
efforts.
Class opened with a
distribution of previous exams, noting a few students were missing. A short overview of the material for the day
was presented; perhaps a little more extensive outline would help set the
stage. As the presentation continued,
there were numerous forward references to tie concepts together; references to
material that would be covered that day and to material to be covered in future
class meetings. Mr. Splane was careful
to talk about alternate ways of using the Word Drawing Toolbar (the topic for
the day) and efficient approaches that were available.
The lecture was conducted in
the computer lab BBC301. Mr. Splane made
good use of the computer demonstration.
Students in the class were following along at their computers. Everyone
seemed to be paying good attention and all computer monitors were apparently
being used for the lab presentation, rather than surfing the internet.
The presentation in the lab
was easy to follow, even from the back of the room. Mr. Splane points to parts of the screen
using both his hand and the cursor.
Through the presentation alternate approaches for achieving some of the
computer goals are explained. Special
issues related to using the tools are also clearly explained.
Mr. Splane speaks clearly
and is easy to hear throughout the lab.
He has a kindly, helpful tone to his voice that helps establish a
comfortable learning environment. He
does a good job of maintaining eye contact, although with the lights down in
the lab (so the overhead projector can be easily seen) this is a little
difficult.
Students follow along
through a well organized but spontaneous demonstration. Mr. Splane occasionally walks back through
the lab to see if anyone is having trouble.
The appropriate pacing of the presentation keeps the students from
becoming bored and surfing the internet.
Students are encouraged to provide information about their own knowledge
of the tools being demonstrated.
Students felt comfortable to
ask questions. All of the students were
engaged in working through the examples on their computers. Questions from students were more limited to
those working in the front of the room, but it seemed that the clarity of the
presentation was good enough to keep almost all of the students working
throughout the lecture. Toward the end
of the class a few students would briefly multitask over to the internet, but
not enough to be an issue.
Exams are carefully designed
to measure progress. A very thorough web
page has been developed to help the students with their lab work and to provide
access to class schedules, outside information, and grading criteria. There are a number of good lab assignments
that Mr. Splane has developed. This
variety of assignments provides plenty of feedback for student progress. Practice exams are also supplied.
Examples related to homework
assignments are presented in class. This
helps keep student attention since they know they will be responsible for
completing an assignment. They are
interested in following the presented example since it will make it easier for
them to complete the homework assignment.
Mr. Splane is very
knowledgeable about the material he is presenting in class. The classroom demonstration was done on the
basis of an outline, but materials were developed through the lecture, often in
response to student questions. Alternate
ways of doing computer operations were discussed, and Mr. Splane often
explained what the easiest or most effective approach would be. The demonstration was not only good
technically, but playful and entertaining for the students.
Mr. Splane is doing an
outstanding job teaching this lab and there are really no improvements
needed. Presentation, testing, course
content are all very good. I am
particularly impressed with how well the 91L instructors are cooperating to
make this a successful course under Mr. Splane’s
leadership.
2006 Comments:
Mike is a very sincere,
warm, and patient individual. He has a passion for teaching and desire to help
students excel. His attitude is well reflected in the course that he teaches
this semester, 91L. 91L is a hand on lab course that teaches office applications.
The skills that students learn in this course are very important for their
university education and future career.
I visited Mike’s 10:30 class
on April 4th. The impression that I got was quite favorable. Mike demonstrated
the assignment at the podium, and students followed him on their own computer
step by step. I noticed that Mike was quite sensitive to students’ needs. He
paced his demonstration well and constantly asked for feedback. And students
had been paying a lot of attention to him. The hand out that Mike gave was well
thought out and clear. The only suggestion that I might have for Mike is that,
if he can add more energy in his voice, it will be even better. Overall, I
think Mike has done a wonderful job in teaching this course.
2004 Comments:
Mike presented the topic of
adding notes to PowerPoint slides. He also distributed PowerPoint and Excel
handouts. Mike then explained the concepts and techniques of how to add notes
with the help of examples from a restaurants opening hours and menu. The subject
matter and difficulty level of the material presented were highly relevant to
the course objectives and were presented in a very effective manner. The
lecture and demonstration were done using the most current technology and
versions of the Microsoft software. I am confident that students would benefit
greatly from this experience and use what they learned in many other courses.
Mike presented and discussed
the topic with the help of [an] overhead computer projection system. He began
his lecture with a quick review of the material discussed the previous week.
The PowerPoint slides that Mike presented were expertly done and well organized.
Mike first introduced the
topic and the new terminology that was to be presented that day. He spoke
clearly and enthusiastically – and asked and answered questions in a cogent
manner. To maintain student attention, Mike interspersed his lecture with humor
and examples of interest and familiarity to students.
The lecture, discussion, and
software demonstration were lively and clear. Mike frequently interacted with
students. His intonation and presentation style were very appropriate.
Students followed the
software demonstration by working hands-on using their computers. Mike paced,
paused, and demonstrated, as necessary. He maintained students’ interest by
asking questions and prodding them to share their own experience relevant to
the topic.
Student participation was
fairly good. Given that this was a computer lab with students working at varied
pace, Mike patiently handled many difficult questions.
I have reviewed the
syllabus, examples of homework assignments, exams, and handouts that Mike gave
to students in this course. These documents are sufficiently rigorous and
reflect objectives of the course very well.
Mike is very competent in
all aspects and components of this course.
Mike is a talented
instructor and prepares well in teaching this course. I am convinced he is
doing an excellent job.