Symmetrical King Pawn Openings.

 

I don’t have a favorite opening system against 1. …e5.

My King’s Gambit games are on another page. This page covers the non-king’s gambit lines I’ve tried.

I like to experiment with offbeat lines. I recently tried the Belgrade Gambit.

 

Mike Splane

Frisco Del Rosario  (2016)

11-1-2001

Comments:

I first heard of the Belgrade gambit on a Monday. “The Belgrade gambit? What’s that?” I wondered, “a spy novel? “ I looked it up. “White can’t really give up two pawns for nothing can he?” I asked around, nobody had seen the opening before. “This opening has great shock value; nobody knows it,” I thought. “Maybe I’ll try it some day.” 

 

The following Thursday I got my chance.  As I confidently played my surprise move, my opponent took one look at the sacrifice, and exclaimed, “The Belgrade Gambit! I LOVE the Belgrade Gambit!”

 

It all turned out ok in the end, but I had a few minutes of great anxiety.

 

A couple of days later I showed the game to Richard Koepcke. He said, “You’ll NEVER play that again!” I laughed and said, “I might.” He laughed and said, “Yes, YOU might.” I just smiled.

 

PS. I’ve played it four times since then.

1

e4

e5

2

Nf3

Nc6

3

Nc3

Nf6

4

d4

ed

5

Nd5

Ne4

6

Qe2

f5

7

Ng5

d3

8

cd

Nd4

9

Qh5+

g6

10

Qh4

Nc2+

11

Kd1

Na1

12

de

c6

13

ef

cd

14

Qd4

Qc7

15

Bd3

Rg8

16

Re1+

Be7

17

f6

1-0

 

Analysis:  a) 5. … Nb4 takes all the fun out of this line for White.

b) 10. … Nc2 is the losing move. The main line is 10. … c6 11. de cd  12. ed Bg7 with an unclear position.

c) After 15 Bd3 Frisco thought for over half an hour, but it is too late to save the game. As he was thinking, I was walking around the tournament room looking at other games, as I habitually do. My friend Chris Murphy asked how I was doing. “I’m a rook down,” I said with a big grin.

He saw my face and exclaimed. “All right! You’ve got him now!”

 

 

Mike Splane

Don Lieberman  (1926)

11-26-1993

Comments:

When I was giving simultaneous exhibitions I wanted an offbeat line against 1. …e5. I knew I could win if my opponents played their own ideas instead of following grandmaster analysis. I came up with 2 c4 and it was quite effective. My only tournament game in this opening transposed into an Old Indian.

1

e4

e5

2

c4

Nf6

3

Nc3

Be7

4

Nf3

d6

5

d4

Nc6

6

h3

0-0

7

Be2

h6

8

Be3

Nh7

9

d5

Nb8

10

Qd2

f5

11

ef

Bf5

12

Bd3

Qd7

13

Rc1

Na6

14

a3

Bd3

15

Qd3

Rf5

16

Ne4

Nc5

17

Bc5

dc

18

g4

Rf3

19

Qf3

Rf8

20

Qe3

Ng5

21

Nd2

e4

22

h4

Qg4

23

hg

Bg5

24

Qg3

Bd2+

25

Kd2

e3+

26

Qe3

1-0

 

Analysis: a) A good plan is 3. … Bc5 followed by 4. … Nc6. Black’s king bishop exerts strong pressure on the a7-g1 diagonal, while White’s bishop is penned in. White has to meet this idea with an early Na4 to swap off the bishop.

b) I’ve noticed a trend in my class A opponents. If they get outplayed positionally they usually panic and sac something unsoundly.

 

 

Mike Splane

Lindell Brady (1965)

5-25-1982

Comments:

For a couple of years, during my “sacrificial period”, I was playing the Center Attack Ruy Lopez, with its early d2-d4. Eventually the line lost its effectiveness after the people who knew me stopped playing 3. … a6

 

Recently (July 2007) I’ve started taking another look at this line and may take it up again

 

When I first started playing in a chess club, Lindell Brady was the best player in town, and a true gentleman. Although I won other games from him, this was the only convincing win. The game was published in Michigan Chess magazine.

1

e4

e5

2

Nf3

Nc6

3

Bb5

a6

4

Ba4

Nf6

5

d4

b5

6

Bb3

ed

7

e5

Ne4

8

Bd5

Bb4+

9

c3

dc

10

0-0

cb

11

Bb2

Nc5

12

Nd4

0-0

13

Nf5

Ne6

14

Nc3

Qg5

15

Be4

g6

16

h4

Qd8

17

Qg4

Ne5

18

Nh6+

Kg7

19

Nf5+

Kh8

20

Nd5

f6

21

Qh3

Bd6

22

Nd6

cd

23

f4

Nc4

24

h5

Kg7

25

hg

hg

26

Qg3

Qe8

27

Nf6

Rf6

28

Bf6+

Kf6

29

f5

Nd2

30

Qc3+

Ke7

31

Qd2

Ra7

32

fe

de

33

Qg5+

Kd7

34

Bg6

Qh8

35

Rf7+

Kc6

36

Rc1+

Kb6

37

Qe3+

1-0

 

Analysis: a) It’s been over 20 years since I played this game, so I can’t fairly annotate it.

b) I remember that I concluded that I should’ve played 16. f4 instead of 16. h4.

c) 21. … Bd6 is the losing move. I was afraid of 21. … Bc5 during the game.

 

 

Mike Splane

Pranab Das  (2066)

12-18-1982

Comments:

This game was played in my first tournament after moving to California. I was still an expert. Like many experts I had no idea how to play calm positional chess, so my games were filled with wild tactics. This time it worked.

1

e4

e5

2

Nf3

Nc6

3

Bb5

d6

4

d4

Bd7

5

0-0

Nge7

6

Re1

a6

7

Bc4

Na5

8

Bf1

Ng6

9

Nc3

Bg4

10

d5

b5

11

a4

b4

12

Na2

c5

13

dc

Nc6

14

Bc4

Nd4

15

Nb4

Bf3

16

gf

Nh4

17

Ra3

d5

18

ed

Bb4

19

Re5+

Kf8

20

Bg5

Qc7

21

Qd4

Ba3

22

Bh4

Bb2

23

Qb2

Qc4

24

Qb7

Qc8

25

Be7+

Kg8

26

Qc8+

Rc8

27

d6

f6

28

d7

Rd8

29

Bd8

1-0

 

Analysis: a) 14 Bc4 is a mistake; I missed the obvious reply because I was moving too fast. 

b) After 14. … Nd4 I thought for a long time My kingside is getting broken open and I have no counterplay. 15. Nb4 allows the a-rook to add reinforcement to the kingside. I thought the tactics after 17. … d5 would favor me due to the center opening up. Luckily I was right.

 

Mike Splane

Gina Finegold  (2136)

5-28-1989

Comments:

I played this line with 5.c4 instead of 5. d4 against the Petroff Defense in two games. I stopped playing 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 shortly after this game, but I still like the idea of c4. I experimented with it a couple of times on move 3 in the King’s Gambit Accepted. I even played it on move 2 against Don Lieberman.

 

1

e4

e5

2

Nf3

Nf6

3

Ne5

d6

4

Nf3

Ne4

5

c5

Be7

6

Nc3

Nc3

7

bc

0-0

8

d4

Bf5

 9

Bd3

Bd3

10

Qd3

Nc6

11

Rb1

b6

12

Rb5

g6

13

h4

a6

14

Rd5

Bf6

15

 h5

Re8+

16

Kd1

Ne7

17

hg

hg

18

Rg5

Qd7

19

Rg3

Qa4+

20

Qc2

Qc2+

21

Kc2

Nf5

22

Rgh3

Re2+

23

Kd3

Rf2

24

g4

Ne7

25

Be3

Ra2

26

Bg5

Bg5

27

Ng5

Kg7

28

Rh7+

Kf6

29

Ne4+

Ke6

30

d5+

Nd5

31

cd5+

Kd5

32

Rf7

Ra4

33

Rc7

Rf8

34

c4+

Rc4

35

Rc4

Rf3+

36

Ke2

Rf4

37

Ke3

Kc4

38

Rc1+

Kd5

39

Kf4

1-0

 

Analysis:

16 Kd1 was a mistake allowing the check on a4.

When I offered the queen trade on move 20, I saw that 26 Bg5 was very strong. Amazingly, it wins a piece. The rest is mop up.